CO129-025 - Bonham - 1848 [7-8] — Page 184

CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案 All AI Reviewed
Series Prev Next

Should this, which is a matter of expediency, be referred to the Secretary of State? He has had the earlier correspondence of the finances under his consideration.

AB.31/Act: 57.71.31/10

I think the force is clear.

There can be no question that a clear case for the ...

... the 3rd the remit this charity unless there is any reason for dissenting from my view to that effect & such that if strong authorizing this lux is made out - Transmit copy to the ... of ... who had knowledge of the subject.

Page information is not present, but text is reordered for better readability.

Revised to:

Should this, which is a matter of expediency, be referred to the Secretary of State? He has had the earlier correspondence of the finances under his consideration.

AB.31/Act:57.71.31/10

I think the force is clear.

There can be no question that a clear case for the H.K. Govt. exists.

On the 3rd, I remit this charity unless there is any reason for dissenting from my view to that effect & such that if strong reasons authorizing this lux are made out - Transmit copy to the ... of ... who had knowledge of the subject.

becomes

Should this, which is a matter of expediency, be referred to the Secretary of State? He has had the earlier correspondence of the finances under his consideration.

AB.31/Act:57.71.31/10

I think the force is clear.

There can be no question that a clear case ...

the 3rd the remit this charity unless thereind for ace any reason for dissenting persing my spent to that effect & such that if shore authorizing this lux is made out - Transmit coprig to the ... of ... who had hew of the sulfect.

Edit History

2026-05-17 04:37:55 · NVIDIA / meta/llama-4-maverick-17b-128e-instruct
Live
View comparison
AI Proofread
Should this, which is a matter of expediency, be referred to the Secretary of State? He has had the earlier correspondence of the finances under his consideration. AB.31/Act: 57.71.31/10 I think the force is clear. There can be no question that a clear case for the ... ... the 3rd the remit this charity unless there is any reason for dissenting from my view to that effect & such that if strong authorizing this lux is made out - Transmit copy to the ... of ... who had knowledge of the subject. Page information is not present, but text is reordered for better readability. Revised to: Should this, which is a matter of expediency, be referred to the Secretary of State? He has had the earlier correspondence of the finances under his consideration. AB.31/Act:57.71.31/10 I think the force is clear. There can be no question that a clear case for the H.K. Govt. exists. On the 3rd, I remit this charity unless there is any reason for dissenting from my view to that effect & such that if strong reasons authorizing this lux are made out - Transmit copy to the ... of ... who had knowledge of the subject. becomes Should this, which is a matter of expediency, be referred to the Secretary of State? He has had the earlier correspondence of the finances under his consideration. AB.31/Act:57.71.31/10 I think the force is clear. There can be no question that a clear case ... the 3rd the remit this charity unless thereind for ace any reason for dissenting persing my spent to that effect & such that if shore authorizing this lux is made out - Transmit coprig to the ... of ... who had hew of the sulfect.
Baseline (Original)
th. Start- Should this, which is a nene as well as matter of expesiony be referred to M trackey take has had the Earlier corresponcence of the fischnces y sender his consideration?? AB. 31/act: 57.71.31/10 I think the force mors.d? ކ މ ވ 11. -73 tus - al be referend כי r be the this top sung that they must ten by the 기념. There can be in quent that a clear case for the H=" A 1 the 3rd the remit this charty unless theind for ace any reason for dissenting persing my spent to that effect & such that if shore authorizing this lux is made out - Transmit coprig to the "?" of= hom had hew of the sulfect 9.11 181 ་་་
2026-05-17 04:37:55 · Baseline
View content

th. Start-

Should this, which is a

nene as well as

matter of expesiony be referred to M trackey take has had the Earlier corresponcence of the fischnces y

sender his consideration??

AB. 31/act:

57.71.31/10

I think the force mors.d?

ކ

މ ވ

11.

-73

tus -

al

be referend

כי

r

be the

this top sung that they must ten by the

기념.

There can be in quent

that a clear case

for the H="

A

1

the 3rd the remit this charty unless theind for ace any reason for dissenting persing my spent to that effect & such that if shore authorizing this lux is made out - Transmit coprig to the "?" of=

hom had hew of the sulfect

9.11

181

་་་

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.